The Assembly Monday voted overwhelmingly in support of bipartisan legislation that sets a 2 percent cap on annual property tax hikes and county and municipal government and school district spending.
The proposal, a compromise between Republican Gov. Chris Christie and the Democratic- controlled Legislature was approved 73-4. Christie will sign the legislation at 2 p.m., Tuesday at the home of Lori and Daniel Danko in Trenton.
“Thanks to the quick action taken last week by the Senate and today by the Assembly, New Jersey families can finally look forward to the kind of real, long-term property tax relief that Trenton has failed to deliver for decades,” Christie said following the 12:34 p.m. vote. “A hard cap of 2 percent with limited exceptions that puts final authority to exceed the cap in the hands of the people is the substantial and sustainable reform New Jersey needs.
“…I look forward to continuing to work with each of them and members of both parties in the legislature to enact the necessary tool kit reforms to control costs and empower local governments to effectively manage under this new cap,” the governor added.
The vote brings to an end the special legislative session Christie ordered on June 30. After the vote, the Assembly immediately adjourned. The Senate also overwhelmingly approved the measure on Thursday.
The governor initially wanted a 2.5 percent cap while the Democrats sent him a 2.9 percent bill. A compromise led to the approval of the 2 percent cap.
When the cap goes into effect locally depends on whether a municipality’s budget year begins on Jan. 1 or July 1.
Under the legislation, there will be a so-called hard 2 percent cap that would have limited exceptions while giving local voters the ultimate decision making authority in whether or not the cap should be exceeded. The cap or any future changes would need to be approved only by the Legislature and the governor and not voters statewide on the November ballot.
Assemblyman John Wisniewski (D-Middlesex), who is also chairman of the state Democratic Party, voted against the cap.
“Today I cast a vote against the conditional veto because it does not contain the conditions the governor himself laid out when he visited this chamber,” Wisniewski said. “I agree with the goals of the cap, especially in light of the success of the current cap passed by Democrats 3 years ago.
“In today’s New York Times, the governor and his aides admitted this is all part of his strategy to demonize public employees to meet his political goals. We already know that billions in local aid and property tax rebates were cut so he could fund his massive tax cut for the 16,000 millionaires in this state.
“There is no exception for reduction in state aid, no exception for energy cost increases, no exception for current contracts and no exception for increases in state mandated reserves for uncollected taxes,” Wisniewski said. “All of these factors are out of the hands of local governing bodies. As was said on the floor of the Assembly, this bill needs work — there are many flaws. My ‘no’ vote was a vote for us getting it right.”
Assembly Republican Leader Alex DeCroce (R-Morris) stressed how the legislation will give local voters the final say on spending in their town or school district.
“Today’s vote represents a victory for taxpayers who have waited many years for elected officials to address their number one concern — property taxes,” DeCroce said. “It is a signal that special interests no longer set the agenda in Trenton at taxpayers’ expense. Cap 2.0 marks the beginning of a reform process which mandates that government establish spending priorities and become more efficient.
“This legislation is the most important initiative in the governor’s tool kit as it puts property taxpayers first by limiting county, local and school spending,” the Assemblyman said. “Just as important is the fact that voters will now have a say in whether government spending should go beyond the capped level, not bureaucrats. It marks the beginning of the process where we now must focus our attention on the remaining tool kit measures in order to provide mayors and local officials the ability to work within the cap.”
Assemblyman John McKeon (D-Essex) said, “This plan is far removed from what the governor first sought, and is a victory for those favoring a flexible cap that could both control property taxes and allow local governments and schools to continue to function. But that doesn’t mean it’s a perfect plan. Without an exemption for special education costs, for instance, this plan will be hurtful and destructive to all the good things we’ve done to help children with special needs.”
Assemblyman John Burzichelli (D-Gloucester) said, “We’ve come a long way to get to this point and this is a far different plan than the governor first demanded. The people we represent desperately need real tax relief, so we will continue working to refine this plan and push forward other concepts in the months ahead.”
http://www.newjerseynewsroom.com/state/n…